agreement of past participle

[Fred Kameny]

François Furet’s introduction to Tocqueville’s De la démocratie en Amérique, vol. 1, contains the following sentence:

 

Les Noirs, esclaves, sont une non-société, puisque la servitude est par définition un pur rapport de force, non un lien « social »; mais le principe de l’esclavage compromet l’existence de la société libre qui l’a instaurée, et qui, une fois qu’elle l’a instauré et perpétué, s’en trouve minée de l’intérieur.

 

Can anyone explain why the first past participle, instaurée, agrees with the object l’ whereas the subsequent past participles instauré and perpétué are left unmodified?

[George Hunt]

I can only think it is because , although the object is still "la servitude" the author has half forgotten it and it thinking of  them as "it".

Or perhaps it could be that it may be enough to use the agreement once  and that subsequent uses are felt unnecessary (because it is now obvious  what the object is).

Or could it be that the author is now making these past participles agree with "esclavage" (which has the same meaning but a different gender) ?

Again it could be just a mistake or looseness.

It is the first time that I have come across this.

[Fred Kameny]

George,

Your explanations are all plausible, but I agree that this is an odd usage. Grevisse shed no light on it.

Best,

Fred

[Chantal Savignat]

Hello.

I think it's an error, if points and ";" are exactly writed like that.

I would write this sentence "mais le principe de l’esclavage compromet l’existence de la société libre qui l’a instauré, et qui, une fois qu’elle l’a instauré et perpétué, s’en trouve minée de l’intérieur."

Because :

the past participle agrees with the objet l' = ok

but the objet l'  is for "le principe" which is masculine.

[Robert]

'Le principe' is the best choice as the antecedent to l' because it is the nearest noun to it.
'L'esclavage' is not as good because it is part of the adjectival phrase 'de l'esclavage.'

I agree with you, Chantal, except there is no English word 'writed.'

[Chantal Savignat]

"written" ...  les verbes irréuliers !! ;-)

[Robert]

What is the significance of 'en' ?

'Qui s’en trouve minée de l’intérieur'
'Qui se trouve minée de l’intérieur'

Merci.

[George Hunt]

I would translate it by "in consequence". I  think the "en" has to refer back to something if only a vague "it" and I was taught that it is a shortened form of "de lui ,d'elle d'eux" .

So here perhaps it means "by it".

[Robert]

That makes sense- it refers back to all the things said before as the causes or background of the current fact. If so, a good English word for that would be 'thus.'

...liberal society that installed it, and which, once having installed and perpetuated it, thus finds itself undermined from within.

(I am only guessing here.)

[George Hunt]

Well it wouldn't be "liberal" for "libre".

I think the author is drawing a distinction between  the "free" and the "enslaved"  in the society then.

[Robert]

...free society that established it, and which, once having established and perpetuated it, as a consequence finds itself undermined from within.